Obviously there are many more, and new tools being developed all the time and if you know of better tools, please leave a comment below or post on our Facebook page. Initial searchīased on my knowledge and some internet searching, I developed a list of 38 applications. That is the summary but if you want the details of what I looked at and how I came to these conclusions, read on. TrainingPeaks probably still has the edge but it is a close call and if you want more detailed analysis you can always look to the powerhouses of training data analysis like Golden Cheetah and WKO5.
#Xert vs trainerroad free#
įinal Surge could well be the outright winner for the wise, the athlete version is free and has very good analysis capabilities, combining this with the free version of Strava, or brand specific apps like Garmin Connect to gather data and populate the diary is a very attractive approach.
However, TrainingPeaks doesn’t have the same social, competition and motivational tools that are built into the Strava system.
TrainingPeaks beats Strava as a planning tool and if you want to work with training plans. TrainingPeaks is the winner for analysis capabilities, although the free version is a little limited, the paid version is very capable in both single workout analysis and longer term reviews and planning. Strava is a little limited in the analysis of longer term data but still works well The Premium/paid version, Strava Summit, has an enhanced analysis capability that makes it very capable for analysing workouts. Strava: Strava provides a good all round package with a useful set of features for analysis, tracking and motivation in the free version. So, what are the best cycling and running training and analysis applications? In no particular order, my top 3 applications are: I have used quite a few over the years and I thought it would be useful to combine my experience with that of my athletes and an in-depth survey of currently available diary application and analysis tools. This decay method will trigger more breakthroughs and variation in your progression to help identify potential decreases or increases that may be missed when using the other methods.There are a lot of applications available to track and analyse running, cycling and other endurance training sessions. No Decay is preferred during the Base phase in general. Optimal Decay can be used during all phases of your Training Program, but it is most effective during Build and Peak phases when fitness breakthroughs are more frequently. This ensures that your progression data stays accurate and provides opportunities for breakthroughs to validate your progress. It has an additional decay that will still express your fitness in cases where your signature numbers have inadvertently become too high. It will follow your breakthroughs and your training loads as they move up and down. This is the default decay method used by the system. This decay method falls in between Optimal and No Decay and can be used to fine tune your signature to reduce the impact of a decay, for training purposes. If you are using this setting and haven’t seen a breakthrough in a while despite many efforts, you may want to choose another decay method.
WARNING: If you use this decay method over longer periods, particularly if anomalies exist in your data (even subtle ones), your fitness signature may end up being higher than what you can achieve and you will no longer be able to obtain a fitness breakthrough. Using this method will tell the system to increase/decrease your signature parameters as your training load increases/decreases. The No Decay method can be used during periods where you are training but not performing any maximal efforts, AND you wish to have the system track your increases & decreases in fitness signature more precisely over this period.